Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
they were big
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "they were big" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe the size of objects, animals, or even abstract concepts in a past context. Example: "The elephants at the zoo were big, much larger than I had imagined."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(20)
they were hefty
they were mammoth
they were huge
they were substantial
they were vast
they were tremendous
they were gigantic
they were large
they were dramatic
they were phenomenal
they were monumental
they were remarkable
they were enormous
they were significant contributors to growth in past decades
they were lovely
they were great
they were immense
they were significant
they were colossal
they were huge steaks
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
58 human-written examples
They were big walkers, too.
News & Media
"They were big and arrogant".
News & Media
And they were big ones.
News & Media
They were big stars".
News & Media
They were big pots.
News & Media
They were big men with big bellies.
News & Media
"They were big lawnmowers," Norell said.
News & Media
They were big by "indie" standards only.
News & Media
They were big, grey rats.
News & Media
They were big shoes indeed.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
1 human-written examples
They were big-bottomed, gravid with liver; they huddled at the back of the pen.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Consider more descriptive alternatives like "enormous", "massive", or "substantial" to enhance the impact and precision of your writing, depending on the specific nuance you want to convey. This may help to avoid being repetitive and make your writing clearer and more impressive.
Common error
Avoid relying solely on "they were big" without providing specific details or comparisons. Instead, add quantifiable metrics or relatable imagery to give the reader a clearer understanding of the scale or impact. For example, use "they were as big as cars" instead of just "they were big".
Source & Trust
93%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "they were big" functions as a descriptive statement, attributing the quality of being large in size, scope, or significance to a subject. As Ludwig confirms, it's a correct and usable phrase in written English. The phrase is often used to provide information about the characteristics of something in the past.
Frequent in
News & Media
92%
Formal & Business
5%
Science
1%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "they were big" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase to describe the size, scale, or significance of a subject. According to Ludwig, the phrase is used in a variety of contexts, including news and media, business, and everyday conversation. While simple, it's essential to provide context or more descriptive alternatives for enhanced clarity. When writing, ensure that the subject and the intended meaning are clear to avoid ambiguity. Consider more descriptive alternatives to enhance the impact and precision of your writing. Common errors to avoid include overusing the phrase without specific details or comparisons.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
they were enormous
Emphasizes a greater degree of size than "they were big".
they were huge
Similar to "they were enormous", but slightly less formal.
they were immense
Highlights an exceptionally large size or scale.
they were massive
Implies both size and weight or impact.
they were gigantic
Suggests a size characteristic of giants, often used figuratively.
they were substantial
Focuses on the significance or amount rather than just physical size.
they were considerable
Similar to "substantial" but emphasizes importance or impact.
they were sizable
A more formal way of saying "they were big".
they were great
Can refer to size, but also to importance or quality; context-dependent.
they were extensive
Describes something that covers a large area or involves a large amount.
FAQs
What does "they were big" mean?
The phrase "they were big" means that a group of things or people had a notable size, magnitude, or importance. The specific meaning depends on the context in which it's used.
How can I use "they were big" in a sentence?
You can use "they were big" to describe the physical size of objects (e.g., "The apples they were big and juicy"), the importance of events (e.g., "They were big moments in history"), or the scale of something (e.g., "They were big productions").
Which is more descriptive, "they were big" or "they were huge"?
"They were huge" is generally more descriptive as it implies a greater size than "they were big". You can also use alternatives like "they were enormous" or "they were massive" for even greater emphasis.
What can I say instead of "they were big" to describe importance?
To describe importance, you can use alternatives like "they were significant", "they were crucial", or "they were pivotal", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
93%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested