Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
they both were
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "they both were" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when talking about two people who have something in common. For example, "They both were excited to start their first day at their new job."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Alternative expressions(19)
they both considered
they were in agreement
they both have
they reached a consensus
they settled on
they were jealous
they were acceptable
they were alright
they were nervous
they were heavy
they were wonderful
they were loud
they were fine
they were okay
they were hungry
they were funny
they were excellent
they were satisfactory
they were yes
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
They both were.
News & Media
They both were dismissed.
Academia
"They both were painters.
News & Media
"They both were stubborn.
News & Media
If so, they both were wrong.
News & Media
And they both were underdogs, too.
News & Media
They both were experimenting — one hopefully, the other tragically.
News & Media
He married Claire Gunn when they both were 18.
News & Media
They both were ardent cold warriors and political moderates.
Encyclopedias
But over all she was healthy; they both were.
News & Media
It was only when saying good night and goodbye that they discovered they both were single.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "they both were", ensure the pronoun 'they' clearly refers to two specific subjects previously mentioned in the text to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity.
Common error
Avoid using "they both were" when the antecedent of 'they' is unclear or could refer to more than two entities. Rephrase to specify the two subjects explicitly for better readability.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "they both were" functions as a subject-verb complement, linking a plural subject ('they') to a description of their state or condition. Ludwig shows numerous examples where this phrase introduces a shared attribute or experience. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is considered grammatically correct.
Frequent in
News & Media
78%
Academia
14%
Science
8%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Wiki
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "they both were" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to indicate that two subjects share a common attribute, state, or experience. Ludwig's AI confirms its correctness and provides numerous examples across various contexts, particularly in news and media. While its register is generally neutral, it is essential to ensure clarity in pronoun reference to avoid ambiguity. Consider alternatives like "both of them were" for emphasis or to remove potential ambiguity. By following best practices and avoiding common errors, writers can effectively use this phrase to enhance their communication.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
both of them were
Emphasizes the 'both' more explicitly, adding a slight emphasis on the duality.
the two of them were
Specifies the number of subjects involved, creating a more formal tone.
each of them was
Highlights the individual aspect of the two subjects before attributing the shared characteristic.
both individuals were
Replaces 'them' with 'individuals' to create a more formal and detached tone.
they had both been
Shifts the tense to past perfect, indicating a state prior to a past event.
the pair were
Uses 'the pair' as a collective noun to refer to the two subjects.
each was
Focuses on the individual nature of the subjects, implying a shared trait without explicitly stating 'both'.
in both cases they were
Adds a contextual element, suggesting the statement applies within specific scenarios.
they jointly were
Replaces 'both' with 'jointly', emphasizing the shared or collaborative nature of the state.
they equally were
Highlights the equality of the state or condition between the two subjects.
FAQs
How do I use "they both were" in a sentence?
Use "they both were" to describe a shared characteristic, action, or state of being that applies to two specific subjects. For example, "John and Mary studied hard; they both were successful on the exam."
What are some alternatives to "they both were"?
Alternatives include "both of them were", "each of them was", or "the two of them were", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it grammatically correct to say "they both was"?
No, it is grammatically incorrect. Since 'they' is plural, the correct verb form is 'were'. Therefore, the correct phrase is "they both were".
When should I use "they both were" instead of "both of them were"?
While both phrases are grammatically correct and often interchangeable, "they both were" is generally considered more concise and natural in everyday conversation. "Both of them were" can be used for emphasis or when 'they' might be ambiguous.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested