The results from these two procedures are compared.
These two procedures are referred as type-1 and type-2 respectively.
The methods of these two procedures will be developed in this paper.
The combination of these two procedures allowed to selectively produce FUR from xylose.
The results ultimately have no value, and provide what is probably misleading information on the relative accuracy of identifications using these two procedures.
Trends for these two procedures regarding utilization, revision procedures, and other demographic information have not been sufficiently explored.
By iterating these two procedures, the final Hermitian matrix and the vectors of both mask and window coefficients are obtained.
The protective effectiveness of these two procedures for the inhibitor addition was evaluated by means of several electrochemical techniques, EIS, polarisation curves and microbalance.
However, in the vast and ever growing literature on fatigue design, comparisons of these two procedures, based on concrete examples, are not commonly available.
These two procedures, although largely depend on each other and known as the combined traffic assignment and control problem, are usually handled separately.
Then, these two procedures were applied to an in vivo CT data set in order to determine to most critical region for repeatability.
