Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(30)
Though these two classifications may coincide with some languages, as is the case to a great extent in the Bantu family, they do so only contingently; being based on different data and oriented differently, they do not logically or necessarily imply each other.
These two classifications often diverge.
All imaging studies were reviewed by the authors and two radiologists who were asked to classify neurogenic HO according to these two classifications on a consensus basis.
None of these two classifications has been validated since to the best of our knowledge neither of them has been directly linked to reproductive outcome.
In these two classifications, the linear models offered 75%and70%0% correct classification rates, whereas the non-linear ones provided 93%and90%0%, using comparable validation procedures.
Your pairing almost certainly fits one of these two classifications: 1.
Similar(30)
While admission rates and LOS increase with increasing AIS and SCS severity, these two classification schemas do not reliably correlate.
While admission rates and length of stay increase with increasing AIS and SCS severity, these two classification schemas do not reliably correlate with each other.
However, these two classification systems are not always consistent.
These two classification systems are placed side by side in table 1.
These two classification systems were based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health ICFF).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com