Sentence examples for these stances are from inspiring English sources

These stances are strikingly similar to those reported in the earlier Penninx and Roosblad study.

Typically these stances are framed as various commitments to Newton and Newtonianism.

That is to say, it must go beyond "the one" and "the two," as both of these stances are prone to generate a one-sided, and hence incomplete world-view.

Both these stances are wrong.

"These stances are a stark contrast from Jesus' ministry to the marginalized".

These stances are based on the advice of a number of immigration advocacy groups such as the National Immigration Forum (NIF), and the National Council of La Raza (NCLR), who felt that the focus must come away from what was best for migrating human beings and onto what was in the national interest.

However, all these stances were dictated by momentary calculations that were peculiar to the various parties.

The best known of these stances were over the Maynooth grant in 1845 and the repeal of the Corn Laws in 1846.

These attitudinal stances are not just cognitive, but predelineate something more encompassing, which Dilthey calls "knowledge".

These ethical stances are held so strongly that the West will often say, in essence, that these particular moral imperatives outweigh any notional right to self-determination.

Artistic stances are enumerated, and principles of foreshortening are explained.