Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(58)
Nearly everyone seems to agree: these party parleys risk irrelevance.
(At the studio, they call these party crashers "the freak factor").
These party heavyweights would prefer not to nominate Sanders, a not-so-secret socialist.
"Bush doesn't have these party structures to go through to get to the right Democrat".
These party leaders seem to share a blind spot with much of the Washington political and media subcultures.
Although not all embrace a soft money ban, most could live with some limits on these party gifts.
But even though they take place in separate cities in separate weeks, these party gatherings do not happen in isolation.
In parliament 100 seats are then distributed among the parties in proportion to their share of these "party list" votes.
Still, the proposal would place only a $76,500 limit per contributor on "soft money" instead of banning these party slush funds altogether.
But with the Democratic nomination likely to be decided by these party leaders and elected officials, voters are taking an extraordinary interest in them this year.
Similar(1)
If anything, evolution would have made damn sure that mechanisms exist to eliminate these party-crashers.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com