Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(19)
These differences included both different preferences between potential near-synonyms that could be used to express information, and also differences in the meanings that individual writers associated with specific words.
These differences included up-regulation of major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II) molecules in the early stage of infection, early peak expressions of interleukin (IL -12 (IL -12 and -10 (IL-12) and long keep of IL-17.
These differences included considerable shifts in the energies of the peaks and appearance of some peaks in the DOS of the studied systems.
These differences included a large number of insertions and deletions.
These differences included changes in central epithelial nuclear staining, nuclear shape and epithelial thickness and continuity.
These differences included vascular morphology, oxygen availability, cytokine and growth factor composition, and stromal cell association.
Similar(41)
Possible explanations for these differences include different study populations; Simon-Tuval and associates [ 30] studied predominantly enrollees of the Clalit Health Services, the largest health maintenance organization in Israel whereas our population was Veterans receiving healthcare through the VHA.
These differences include: conflict of values, differing needs and conflict of needs.
These differences include the use of different substrains of Sprague-Dawley rats (the U.S. rats were more susceptible to DMBA than the European rats), different sources for diet and DMBA, differences in environmental conditions, and differences in MF exposure metrics.
Possible reasons for these differences include non liver-type cells possibly lackinon liver-types (or expressing different ones) that cellsnfluence drug entry/efflux or may show differential toxicity.
These differences include object disappearance or appearance and contrast inversion due to different spectral bands or different times of acquisition.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com