Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Several thermodynamic tests from the literature subjected to tension-compression and bending loads are studied to validate our multiscale model, which shows good accuracy and reliability.
In addition to developing the fraction model to assess putative ncRNAs, we also employ thermodynamic tests (involving free energy, melting temperature and energy landscape) to analyze 151 short (<400 nt) putative ncRNAs in FANTOM3; only short RNAs are used for this analysis to reduce errors in secondary folding algorithms.
The thermodynamic tests are applied to ten ncRNA families, namely tRNA, 5S rRNA, 5.8S rRNA, 6S RNA, SRP RNA, SL1 RNA, U6 RNA, UnaL2, snoRNA, and His3 in Rfam (Griffiths-Jones et al. 2005) and 151 putative ncRNAs (<400 nt) in FANTOM3 (Carninci et al. 2005).
Similar(57)
Thermodynamic consistency testing (point and direct tests) is also performed for all the newly measured experimental data.
Satisfactory modeling was obtained of the measured VLE data and thermodynamic consistency tests showed the data to be not inconsistent.
Thermodynamic experimental tests were carried out on activated carbon samples (GAC), produced starting from a commercial carbon by chemical oxidation with either nitric acid or hydrogen peroxide, to support the dynamic study and to identify the sample with higher adsorption capacity.
There exists only a small range of aggregation numbers for which the micelles pass all the thermodynamic stability tests [ 24– 27] and only these results are further analyzed.
Thermodynamic consistency testing for the VLE data sets was performed with the Herington area test for the isobaric data and the point test of Van Ness and Fredenslund for the isothermal data.
Thermodynamic consistency testing is also performed for the newly measured experimental data.
All the VLE data passed the thermodynamic consistency test by Herington method and showed positive deviations from ideal behavior.
The above data met the thermodynamic consistency test and were correlated with the Wilson, NRTL, and UNIQUAC equations.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com