Suggestions(1)
Exact(6)
Deviation from average thermal slope is up to 25 °F. .
Deviation from average thermal slope is up to 25 °F.
The displacement of measured thermal slope lines in the two wells is about 16 °F, in average.
In well 'C3,' the displacement of measured thermal slope lines obtained by two different thermometer gauges (quartz or strain) is around 2.5 °F.
For the higher temperatures, the two-step thermal emission can be identified as the "Thermal Slope" at the lower voltages, turning into the "Thermal-Tunneling Slope" at about V = 2 V on the farther side of the "Cape".
The geothermal line is displaced in each well and even by changing the measuring tools or time of measurement, the line shows some changes: In well 'C3,' the displacement of measured thermal slope lines obtained by two different thermometer gauges (quartz or strain) is around 2.5 °F.
Similar(53)
In this experiment, the MF under thermal gradient grew as L = 0.61 t − 0.20 and the MF protruding from similar stacked lipid without thermal gradient grew with about three times slower slope as L = 0.23 t − 0.11.
ABA_embryo: ABA in embryo (pg/DW); ABA_endosperm: ABA in endosperm (pg/DW); DW: kernel dry matter weight (mg/kernel); FW: kernel fresh matter weight (mg/kernel); %DW = DW/FW× 100; Water: kernel water content (mg/kernel); Rate = (Water/FW × 100)/(thermal time interval); Slope: regression line slope of (Water/FW × 100) as a function of thermal time.
A modified photovoltaic thermal (PVT) double slope active solar still was designed and fabricated for remote locations.
To solve this problem, a new embankment structure that combines the CRR and a slope thermal protection measure was designed, and a field experiment was carried out in a section of the QTR at Tuotuohe to examine its convection and thermal characteristics and to assess its cooling performance.
Although there was considerable variation within families between thermal environments, random slope models did not produce superior model fits, indicating that GxE interactions were comparatively weak.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com