there were supported

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "there were supported" is not correct in standard written English.
It is likely intended to convey that something was supported, but the construction is awkward and unclear. Example: "In the study, there were supported claims about the effectiveness of the new treatment."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

There were support events [in Leipzig] in the weeks before".

The Guardian

But what there is supports the agency.

University of California, Berkeley

Recommendations are only provided when there is supporting evidence.

Stanford University

There is supporting evidence for the idea.

Science Magazine

There are supporting approaches to technically merge mathematical models [40].

Plosone

There is supporting evidence for such changes.

BMC Public Health

Now there's support from people.

Independent

And there is support from unlikely places.

The Guardian

Again, there is support for this.

The New Yorker

Elsewhere there was support for the deal.

The Guardian

But there is support of another kind.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When you intend to express that a claim, idea, or initiative received backing, use grammatically correct alternatives such as "there was support for", "they were backed", or "they were endorsed".

Common error

Avoid using the phrase "there were supported" as it's grammatically awkward and unclear. Instead, use a clearer and more direct construction to express the intended meaning. For example, instead of saying "There were supported claims", try "The claims were supported" or "There was support for the claims".

Linguistic Context

The phrase is an attempt to express a passive construction, indicating that something received backing or endorsement. However, it is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI marks it as incorrect.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "there were supported" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. As Ludwig AI highlights, it is not standard written English. Instead, it's recommended to use alternatives like "there was support for", "they were backed", or "they were endorsed" to express the intended meaning correctly. The incorrectness makes it unsuitable for any context, and clarity is essential for effective communication. Opting for grammatically sound alternatives ensures that your message is accurately conveyed.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

there was support for

Changes the verb tense and preposition to convey the existence of support.

support existed for

Reorders the sentence to emphasize the presence of support.

backing was provided for

Replaces "supported" with "backing" and uses a passive construction.

endorsement was given to

Substitutes "supported" with "endorsement" to indicate formal approval.

funds were allocated to

Specifically refers to financial support.

resources were provided for

Indicates that resources, not necessarily financial, were made available.

assistance was offered to

Suggests help or aid was given.

advocacy existed for

Focuses on the act of advocating or promoting something.

approval was granted for

Emphasizes the formal act of approving something.

promotion was given to

Highlights the act of promoting or advertising something.

FAQs

How can I correctly express the idea of support being provided?

Instead of using the grammatically incorrect phrase "there were supported", you can use phrases like "there was support for", "they were backed", or "they were endorsed" to convey the intended meaning.

What are some alternative ways to say something received support?

Alternatives include "received backing", "gained endorsement", or "obtained approval", depending on the specific context.

Is "there were supported" grammatically correct?

No, "there were supported" is not grammatically correct in standard English. It's better to use phrases like "there was support" or restructure the sentence to use the passive voice correctly, such as "the claims were supported".

What is the difference between "there were supported" and "there was support for"?

"There were supported" is grammatically incorrect. The correct way to express that something had support is to use "there was support for" or rephrase the sentence for clarity.