Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
there were only a few
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "there were only a few" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a small number or quantity of something. Example: "At the party last night, there were only a few guests who arrived on time."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Academia
Alternative expressions(8)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
There were only a few.
News & Media
There were only a few onlookers.
News & Media
There were only a few obscure entries.
News & Media
There were only a few missteps.
News & Media
There were only a few hundred.
News & Media
"There were only a few blitzes.
News & Media
There were only a few public complaints.
News & Media
There were only a few slip-ups.
News & Media
There were only a few tradeoffs that we ran into.
Academia
"At that time there were only a few dozen newspapers.
News & Media
There were only a few upsides to the task.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "there were only a few", ensure the context clearly indicates what the limited quantity refers to for clarity.
Common error
Avoid using "there were only a few" when referring to something that is expected to be abundant. This can create a sense of understatement or sarcasm unintentionally.
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "there were only a few" functions as a determiner phrase, specifically quantifying a noun in a limited or reduced sense. Ludwig provides numerous examples to illustrate its proper use.
Frequent in
News & Media
50%
Science
25%
Academia
15%
Less common in
Wiki
5%
Formal & Business
3%
Reference
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "there were only a few" is a common and grammatically sound way to express a limited quantity. As indicated by Ludwig, its usage spans various contexts, including News & Media, Science, and Academia. The expert rating is high due to its grammatical correctness, source authority, and consistent usage. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity and avoid using it sarcastically. Consider alternatives like "a limited number" or "a scant few" for a more formal tone. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and provides numerous examples for reference.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
only a handful existed
Emphasizes the small number by using the idiom "handful".
a scant few were present
Uses "scant" to highlight the insufficiency or barely adequate number.
very few individuals were there
More formal and emphasizes the individual presence.
a limited number were available
Focuses on the limited availability rather than just the quantity.
few in number could be found
Highlights the difficulty in finding the items or people.
just a small amount remained
Emphasizes that only a small amount survived or was left.
hardly any were seen
Highlights the lack of visibility or presence.
a trickle of attendees arrived
Uses a metaphor to describe the slow and sparse arrival.
a smattering were noticed
Indicates that only a scattered and small number were observed.
barely any were around
An informal way to express the near absence of something or someone.
FAQs
How can I rephrase "there were only a few" to sound more formal?
To sound more formal, you could use phrases such as "a limited number", "a scant few", or "very few individuals".
What's the difference between "there were only a few" and "there were a few"?
"There were only a few" emphasizes the scarcity or limited quantity of something. "There were a few" simply acknowledges the presence of some, without necessarily highlighting that the number is small.
Is it always appropriate to use "there were only a few" in writing?
While grammatically correct, "there were only a few" is best used when you want to emphasize that the quantity is surprisingly or disappointingly small. Consider the context and the effect you want to create.
What are some less common alternatives to "there were only a few"?
Some less common, more evocative alternatives include "a trickle of", "a smattering of", or "hardly any", which add color and nuance to your writing.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
86%
Authority and reliability
4.6/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested