Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

there were no item

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "there were no item" is not correct in written English.
It should be "there were no items" to be grammatically accurate. Example: "After checking the inventory, I confirmed that there were no items left in stock."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Empty spaces indicate that there were no item changes.

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

In the course of the validation studies, it was obvious that there were no items from the adapted test version which matched to these characteristics.

There were no items about milder injuries, other locations for sports related injuries, or details of the types of injuries that took place in the sports facilities.

We used only three screen items to measure delusional-like experiences and there were no items for hallucinations.

Science

Plosone

There were no items that were never observed.

There were no items which raters consistently disagreed on or were notably more problematic than others.

Science

BMJ Open

For I and A there were no items with greater than 10% missing data.

With respect to the outcome measure, there were no items for hallucinations.

There were no items with 80% of the answers falling in one category.

The last limitation is that there were no items addressing life events and economic problems in this survey.

There were no items that the carer panel rated either higher or lower than the other panels.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the plural form "items" when referring to multiple objects. If referring to a single object, use "there was no item".

Common error

Avoid using "there were no item" as it's grammatically incorrect. Remember to match the verb conjugation with the noun's quantity: "there was no item" (singular) or "there were no items" (plural).

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

78%

Authority and reliability

2.2/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "there were no item" functions as a statement of absence. As pointed out by Ludwig AI, this construction is grammatically incorrect and should be corrected to either "there was no item" or "there were no items", depending on the context.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

25%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Wiki

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "there were no item" is flagged by Ludwig AI as grammatically incorrect. The correct forms are "there was no item" (singular) or "there were no items" (plural). The intended purpose is to indicate absence or lack. Although the search results provide various contexts, it's crucial to use the correct grammatical structure to ensure clarity and credibility. Always remember to use "items" in the plural form if there is more than one item missing. Using proper grammar enhances the message’s reception across diverse domains like science, news, and academic writing.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say "there were no item"?

The grammatically correct options are "there was no item" (singular) or "there were no items" (plural). The choice depends on whether you are referring to one item or multiple items.

What can I say instead of "there were no item" if I want to emphasize that nothing was found?

You can use phrases like "nothing was found", "no items were available", or "the stock was depleted depending on the context".

Is it ever correct to say "there were no item"?

No, "there were no item" is grammatically incorrect. You should always use either the singular form "there was no item" or the plural form "there were no items".

How do I choose between "there was no item" and "there were no items"?

Use "there was no item" when you're referring to a single object. For example, "There was no item on the shelf that I needed." Use "there were no items" when referring to multiple objects. For example, "There were no items left in the box".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

78%

Authority and reliability

2.2/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: