there were no errors

USAGE SUMMARY

"there were no errors" is correct and usable in written English.
You would use it when describing a situation in which no mistakes were made. For example, "After I ran the program, there were no errors."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

23 human-written examples

Fortunately, there were no errors in this $2 million car.

The New York Times

Researchers were double-checking the data to make sure there were no errors, the company said.

The New York Times

There were no errors, four double plays, just two unintentional walks.

The New York Times - Sports

(Entitled The troubles are still raging for the Guardian's media pundit, you can read it here) There were no errors of fact of significance in the piece, but the word is that it was felt that such ad hominem criticism was not what the Independent editor wanted in future.

The Guardian

"I certainly felt responsibility and wanted to make sure there were no errors, that Tolstoy's texts were not distorted," he said, adding that, in his opinion, if everyone in the world read Tolstoy, we might all be kinder to one another.

The New Yorker

In the filing on Monday, Supervising Deputy Attorney General Victoria B. Wilson wrote that there were no errors, and that Dr. Murray's lawyers had forfeited opportunities to object to the judge's rulings, according to The A.P. By the standards of Los Angeles celebrity trials, the Jackson suit seems a quiet affair.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

37 human-written examples

There were no error messages.

Diabetes Care

Make sure that there are no errors and that the information matches your records.

The New York Times

It is also shown that there are no errors in the treatments presented in my paper.

Electrochimica Acta

If there are no errors, Eq. (29) will be equal to Eq. (24).

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

We first assume that there are no errors in the catalog.

Earth, Planets and Space

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting findings, use "there were no errors" to clearly and concisely state the absence of mistakes, reinforcing confidence in the results.

Common error

Avoid using "there were no errors" as a blanket statement without proper validation. Ensure thorough checks have been performed to confidently assert the absence of mistakes within a defined scope.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "there were no errors" functions as an affirmative statement indicating the absence of mistakes or inaccuracies. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and usable in written English. The examples confirm its function in various contexts, from technical reports to sports commentary.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

55%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "there were no errors" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase to assert the absence of mistakes, suitable for various contexts ranging from news reports to scientific publications. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. While versatile, remember to validate the scope of accuracy and consider using more formal alternatives like "the outcome was without error" in certain settings. The phrase functions as a clear statement of correctness and provides confidence in the accuracy of the subject at hand.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

there weren't any errors

Replaces "were no" with "weren't any" which is a contraction of "were not any", maintaining the same meaning but with a slightly more informal tone.

there were no mistakes

Substitutes "errors" with "mistakes", offering a more general term for inaccuracies, maintaining the same overall meaning.

no errors were present

Changes the sentence structure to emphasize the absence of errors using "were present" instead of the existential "there were".

errors were nonexistent

Uses "nonexistent" to directly state that errors did not exist, offering a stronger emphasis on their absence.

everything was correct

Shifts the focus from the absence of errors to the correctness of everything, implying a broader scope of accuracy.

all was accurate

Similar to "everything was correct", this focuses on the accuracy of the subject matter, suggesting a comprehensive correctness.

the results were flawless

Emphasizes the perfection of the results, using "flawless" to indicate the absence of any imperfections, including errors.

the outcome was without error

Uses a more formal tone to state that the outcome lacked any errors, highlighting a rigorous standard of accuracy.

the data was error-free

Highlights that the data is without errors

accuracy was absolute

Highlights that the accuracy is absolute

FAQs

How can I rephrase "there were no errors" to sound more formal?

You could use phrases like "the outcome was without error" or "accuracy was absolute" to convey a more formal tone than "there were no errors".

What's a simpler way to say "there were no errors"?

A simpler way to say "there were no errors" is "everything was correct" or "there were no mistakes".

How does "the results were flawless" differ in meaning from "there were no errors"?

"The results were flawless" emphasizes the perfection of the results, while "there were no errors" simply indicates the absence of mistakes. "The results were flawless" suggests a higher degree of accuracy and polish.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "there were no errors"?

"There were no errors" is appropriate in contexts where you need to clearly state the absence of mistakes, such as reporting results, providing feedback, or confirming the accuracy of information.