Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

there were multiple

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of the sentence "there were multiple" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when you want to indicate the presence of a large number of something or a variety of different things. For example, "There were multiple vendors selling artisanal crafts at the farmer's market."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

56 human-written examples

In both of those long trials there were multiple defendants.

News & Media

The New York Times

For several species there were multiple independent estimates of traits.

Science

AoB PLANTS

In addition there were multiple independent spikes and sharp waves.

Among 1834 study participants there were multiple statistically significant relationships.

There were multiple factors.

News & Media

The Economist

Suddenly there were multiple offers.

News & Media

The New York Times

Coverage: There were multiple articles.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

4 human-written examples

There were multiple chances for a comeback victory, which all ended with turnovers... or penalties.

News & Media

Huffington Post

Soon, there were multiple offers above the asking price.

News & Media

The New York Times

There were multiple reasons for landscape changes.

Science

Pedosphere

There were multiple such rooms spread over four floors.

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "there were multiple" to clearly indicate more than one instance or reason for something. Ensure the context supports the plural form of the subsequent noun.

Common error

Avoid using a singular noun after "there were multiple". For example, instead of "There were multiple reason", use "There were multiple reasons".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "there were multiple" functions as an existential quantifier, asserting the existence of more than one entity or reason. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is commonly used in English writing.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

46%

Science

38%

Academia

6%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "there were multiple" is a frequently used phrase in English to indicate the presence of several entities, reasons, or factors. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and wide applicability. It is particularly common in news and media, science, and academic writing, but also appropriate for many contexts thanks to its neutral register. When using the phrase, ensure correct noun agreement and consider alternatives like "there were several" or "there were numerous" depending on the desired nuance. Be aware of the importance of context and choose the phrase that best reflects the message you want to convey. The phrase should be followed by a plural noun.

FAQs

How can I use "there were multiple" in a sentence?

Use "there were multiple" to indicate the presence of several items or reasons. For example, "There were multiple reasons why the project failed" or "There were multiple candidates for the job".

What are some alternatives to "there were multiple"?

You can use alternatives like "there were numerous", "there were several", or "there were various" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "there was multiple"?

No, it is not correct. The correct phrase is "there were multiple", as "were" is the plural form of "was" and should be used with "multiple" which indicates more than one.

What's the difference between "there were multiple" and "there were many"?

While both indicate a quantity greater than one, "there were multiple" often suggests a more specific or countable number, while "there were many" implies a larger, potentially uncountable quantity.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: