Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
there were huge
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "there were huge" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the existence of something large or significant in a particular context. Example: "There were huge crowds at the concert, making it difficult to move around."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Science
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
57 human-written examples
There were huge risks.
News & Media
There were huge traffic jams.
News & Media
There were huge expectations for this season.
News & Media
There were huge amounts of floor space.
News & Media
"There were huge barriers to entry".
News & Media
There were huge battles over standards.
News & Media
There were huge queues outside the Everyman.
News & Media
There were huge flames and lots of smoke.
News & Media
As a result, there were huge queues outside the Whitehall.
News & Media
And "there were huge spiders inside the cave".
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
1 human-written examples
There were huge blasts, simultaneous concussions with aftershocks that knocked us back.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "there were huge" to emphasize the magnitude or impact of something. It is effective for highlighting the size, scale, or significance of events, objects, or quantities.
Common error
While appropriate in many contexts, avoid overuse in formal or academic writing. Opt for more precise language like "significant", "substantial", or "considerable" to convey specific meanings without sacrificing formality.
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "there were huge" functions as an existential clause emphasizing the existence of something large or significant. It typically introduces a subject that is notable for its size, quantity, or impact. As noted by Ludwig AI, this phrase is considered grammatically correct and widely used.
Frequent in
News & Media
60%
Academia
20%
Science
10%
Less common in
Formal & Business
5%
Wiki
3%
Encyclopedias
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "there were huge" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to emphasize the existence of something substantial, significant, or large in scale. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is widely accepted and employed across various contexts, particularly in news and media. While versatile, it is important to consider the register and choose more precise alternatives like "significant" or "substantial" in formal or academic settings. By understanding its function and purpose, writers can effectively use "there were huge" to enhance their communication while avoiding overuse or inappropriateness.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
there were massive
Replaces "huge" with "massive", suggesting something of great size and impact.
there were enormous
Uses "enormous" to emphasize the great size or extent of something.
there were immense
Employs "immense" to convey a sense of great scale or degree.
there were large
Uses "large" as a more general term for size, suitable for various contexts.
there were substantial
Employs "substantial" to denote a significant amount or degree of something.
there were vast
Substitutes "huge" with "vast", indicating a great extent or expanse.
there were considerable
Substitutes "huge" with "considerable", highlighting the importance or significance of something rather than just its size.
there were great
Replaces "huge" with "great", suggesting importance or intensity.
there were significant
Replaces "huge" with "significant" to emphasize the importance or impact of something.
the numbers were huge
Rephrases to focus on the magnitude of numbers, emphasizing quantity.
FAQs
What does "there were huge" mean?
The phrase "there were huge" indicates that a large quantity or degree of something existed. It emphasizes the size or scale of what is being described.
What can I say instead of "there were huge"?
You can use alternatives like "there were massive", "there were substantial", or "there were significant" depending on the context.
Is it grammatically correct to say "there were huge"?
Yes, "there were huge" is grammatically correct. "There were" is the plural form of "there was", and "huge" is an adjective describing the subject.
How to use "there were huge" in a sentence?
You can use "there were huge" to describe the magnitude of something, for example, "There were huge crowds at the stadium" or "There were huge improvements in the project's efficiency".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
87%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested