Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

there were fires

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "there were fires" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe the existence of multiple fires in a particular context, such as a news report or a narrative. Example: "During the summer, there were fires across the region that caused significant damage to the forests."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

25 human-written examples

"Everywhere you looked, there were fires everywhere.

News & Media

The New York Times

"There were fires every week," Mr. Pabón recalled.

News & Media

The New York Times

There were fires being set in the bathrooms.

News & Media

The Guardian

But "within a year there were fires on the ridges and deranged chanting.

News & Media

Independent

There were fires, crumbling buildings, strong aftershocks and even forecasts of snow.

News & Media

The New York Times

There were fires made by families keeping round-the-clock vigils.

News & Media

The New Yorker
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

There is smoke and there is fire – but there is no fear.

Employees who break the rules there are fired.

News & Media

TechCrunch

"There are fires everywhere.

News & Media

The Economist

And unfortunately, there are fires".

News & Media

The New York Times

Where there are forests, there are fires.

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "there were fires", ensure the context clearly indicates the location or cause of the fires to provide more informative content.

Common error

Avoid using "there were fires" repeatedly in close proximity; instead, vary your sentence structure by using active voice where appropriate to make your writing more dynamic and engaging. For example use the alternatives like "fires broke out", or "fires erupted".

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "there were fires" functions as an existential clause, asserting the presence of multiple fires. Ludwig confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

95%

Encyclopedias

3%

Science

2%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "there were fires" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to indicate the presence of multiple fire incidents. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread usage, predominantly in neutral contexts such as news and media reporting. While alternatives like ""fires broke out"" or ""fires erupted"" can add nuance, it's crucial to provide clear context about the fires' location or cause for informative communication. Avoiding overuse and incorporating active voice can further enhance writing quality.

FAQs

How can I use "there were fires" in a sentence?

Use "there were fires" to describe the existence of multiple fire incidents in a specific area or time period. For instance, "During the drought, there were fires across the state."

What are some alternatives to saying "there were fires"?

You can use alternatives like "fires broke out", "fires erupted", or "several fires started" depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "there were fires"?

Yes, "there were fires" is grammatically correct. It uses the existential "there" to indicate the presence of multiple fires.

What's the difference between saying "there were fires" and "fires occurred"?

"There were fires" emphasizes the existence of fires, while "fires occurred" highlights the event of the fires happening. The choice depends on what you want to emphasize in your writing.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

89%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: