there is no involvement

USAGE SUMMARY

"there is no involvement" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to indicate that someone or something is not involved in an activity or situation. For example: "Due to lack of evidence, there is no involvement of the company in the scandal."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

18 human-written examples

"However, I am totally confident that there is no involvement in public works of  any description".

Independent

But the A.A.P. asserted last week that "there is no involvement by any commercial entity in the development of any statement or report" it issues.

The New York Times

He tried to show that, when philosophers carry out such investigations, they find that, roughly speaking, it is the way people act that leads to the attribution of these properties and that there is no involvement of anything internally private.

Encyclopedia Britannica

LivingSocial says that there is no involvement from any outside groups.

TechCrunch

There is no involvement of employers, making health insurance a true consumer choice.

Health Economics Review

She confirms also that Oftertix did not directly acquire the company: "There is no involvement with Ofterix or its founder.

TechCrunch

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

42 human-written examples

Mr. Baker said Friday that there had been "no involvement" between his staff and Mr. Cahill's former aides.

The New York Times

The AVAG was involved in the study design; there was no involvement of the funders in the data analyses, manuscript preparation and publication decisions.

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

"No strings were pulled, and there was no involvement of Senate staff".

The New York Times

There's no involvement for a man who's not potent enough.

The New York Times

In the operation to retake Sinjar, there was no involvement by the Iraqi Army, the Kurdish official told me.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "there is no involvement", ensure clarity by specifying what entity lacks involvement and in what activity or situation. For instance, "There is no involvement of external consultants in this project."

Common error

Avoid using "there is no involvement" without specifying the subject and context. For example, instead of just saying "There is no involvement", clarify with "There is no involvement by the government in this particular sector."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "there is no involvement" functions as a negative assertion, denying any participation, connection, or influence. It's a direct way to state a lack of involvement as confirmed by Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

36%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "there is no involvement" is a commonly used phrase to negate any form of participation or association. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and usable across various contexts. It is most frequently found in science, news and media, and formal business settings. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying the subject and the activity from which involvement is absent. While it maintains a neutral to formal tone, remember to specify the context to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

there isn't any participation

Emphasizes the absence of active participation.

no participation exists

Formally states the non-existence of participation.

no connection is present

Highlights the absence of a link or association.

there's no association

Focuses on the lack of a specific relationship or tie.

there's no link

Simple and direct way of stating no link exists.

no contribution is made

Emphasizes that nothing was contributed to the context.

there's no hand in it

An idiomatic way of saying someone wasn't responsible or involved.

no part is played

Focuses on the absence of any role or function.

nothing to do with it

Informal way of expressing non-involvement.

disavow any association

Formally denying any relationship or involvement.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "there is no involvement"?

You can use alternatives like "there isn't any participation", "no connection is present", or "no part is played" depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "there is no involvement" or "there isn't any involvement"?

Both "there is no involvement" and "there isn't any involvement" are grammatically correct and convey the same meaning. The choice often depends on personal preference and the desired tone.

When should I use "there is no involvement" in a formal context?

Use "there is no involvement" in formal contexts when you need to clearly and directly state that someone or something is not participating or connected to a particular activity or situation. For example, in legal documents or official reports.

What does "there is no involvement" imply?

The phrase "there is no involvement" implies a complete absence of participation, connection, or responsibility in a specific situation or activity. It signifies that the entity in question has no role or influence.