there is no aftermath

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "there is no aftermath" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that there are no consequences or results following a particular event or action. Example: "After the decision was made, the team felt relieved, as they believed there is no aftermath to worry about."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

There is no aftermath, no shadow of Hitler on the century ahead.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

"In this case, there was no aftermath," she said.

The New York Times

But what really makes this novel so distinct is its depiction of the aftermath; there is no immediate fist-in-the-air triumph, but a long and difficult struggle to return to normality after a traumatic event.

The Guardian - Books

"Panic can only be borne by a man," his sardonic wife concludes of the aftermath, "if there is no witness".

The New York Times - Books

There is no cure for heart failure, the aftermath of a heart attack, and the condition is common.

The Guardian

In the aftermath of these shocks, there is no guarantee that American businesses and households will react to tax cuts and lower interest rates in the same way that they did in the past.

The New Yorker

Unfortunately, as often happens in the chaotic aftermath of a disaster, there is no comprehensive listing of where all of the evacuees were resettled.

BMC Public Health

No one had ever played a fifth set that ended at 70-68, so there was no precedent for its aftermath, no blueprint for how to manage that type of fatigue.

The New York Times - Sports

The Chilcot report concludes that the intelligence behind the invasion of Iraq was faulty and there was no plan for the aftermath.

The Guardian - Business

Media analyses claiming lazily that there was no planning for the aftermath of the Iraq War should look closer at the public record.

The Guardian

There's no question, watching the aftermath on major cable networks such as CNN and MSNBC -- and to a lesser extent on Fox News -- Trump's performance was overmatched by Hillary.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "there is no aftermath", ensure the context clearly defines the event or action being referred to, and that the lack of consequences is a key point of emphasis.

Common error

Avoid using "there is no aftermath" when there are minor or subtle consequences; the phrase implies a complete absence of any effects, not just a lack of major ones.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "there is no aftermath" functions as an assertion or declaration, stating the absence of any consequential period or results following an event. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

66%

Science

19%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "there is no aftermath" is used to assert the absence of consequences or lasting effects following an event. Ludwig AI analysis confirms it's grammatically correct and usable in written English. While the phrase is not very common, it's found in various contexts, particularly in News & Media, Science, and Wiki articles. When using this phrase, it is important to ensure that the context is appropriate and that there truly are no significant repercussions. Alternatives such as "there are no consequences" or "there is no impact" can be used for similar effect.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

there are no repercussions

This alternative focuses on the absence of negative consequences following an event.

there are no consequences

This phrase is a direct synonym, highlighting the absence of any results or effects.

there is no fallout

This alternative emphasizes the lack of negative or adverse effects.

there is no impact

This phrase stresses the lack of influence or effect from a particular action or event.

there is no effect

This is a general term indicating the absence of any discernible change or result.

no consequences ensue

This option is more formal and emphasizes that no results or effects follow.

no repercussions arise

Similar to "there are no repercussions", this version uses more formal language.

it leaves no trace

This option suggests that the event disappears completely, without any lasting evidence.

it has no lasting effects

This alternative emphasizes that the event does not have any long-term impact.

it doesn't leave a mark

This phrase implies that the event does not have a significant or memorable impact.

FAQs

How can I use "there is no aftermath" in a sentence?

You can use "there is no aftermath" to emphasize the absence of consequences following an event. For example: "Despite the initial concerns, there is no aftermath to the new policy."

What can I say instead of "there is no aftermath"?

You can use alternatives like "there are no consequences", "there is no impact", or "it leaves no trace" depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "there are no aftermath"?

No, the correct phrase is "there is no aftermath". "Aftermath" is a singular noun in this context, so it requires the singular verb "is".

What's the difference between "there is no aftermath" and "there are no consequences"?

While similar, "there is no aftermath" often refers to a broader sense of the period following an event, while "there are no consequences" focuses specifically on the lack of results or effects stemming from the event.