Sentence examples for there is a minimal difference from inspiring English sources
The phrase "there is a minimal difference" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing slight distinctions or variations between two or more items, concepts, or situations. Example: "After comparing the two products, I found that there is a minimal difference in their performance."
Business groups cite studies conducted for auto manufacturers, as well as an opinion from the Environmental Protection Agency that says there is a minimal difference between the California plan and the one put forward by the environmental agency.
The chapter carries out an analysis in terms of the classification method, which shows that there is a minimal difference between the fatigue design S-N curve obtained by using N4 instead of N3, when the inherent scatter in fatigue data is taken into account.
Indeed the crowd for what was the biggest match of the English league season matched that of the World Cup final in Rome two months later (there was a minimal difference of less than a thousand between the two).
However, there was a minimal difference in the proportions of patients with oppositional defiant disorder, which has been shown to influence responses to stimulant treatment [ 18].
There was a minimal difference in median peak viral load between the D+R+ and the D−R+ recipients for either transplant group.
There was a minimal difference between the two secondary-antibody versions in terms of the proportions positive at the different IFA titers.
In contrast, there was a minimal difference of the size change profile between the MA-4.8 polymersome with a cross-linked bilayer and that without a cross-linked bilayer.
The clinical observers noted a much larger proportion of environment, training, health and Safety and patient related glitches, while there was a minimal difference between the observers for absence, slips and equipment maintenance.
There was a minimal difference in the primary endpoint of mean change in hemoglobin (baseline to Week 13) between the QW and the EDS groups (-0.04 g/dL; 95% confidence interval: -0.26, 0.17 g/dL).
The situation for group 4 is that from all, this is the extreme case of group behavior since there is a minimal connectivity degree difference of 1 between first and second order collaborators, that is, for most nodes, the weight of collaboration among each other is the same (weight 2) and only few have a weight of 1, and none of weight 3 or higher.
In 1982 Stetz and colleagues analyzed the reliability of the PAC and reported a precision of 15%; that is, there must be a minimal difference of 15% between determinations of CO (three measurements per determination) to suggest clinical significance [17].
