there hasn't been

USAGE SUMMARY

"there hasn't been" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used to describe something that has not existed, occurred, or been experienced in the past, up until now. Example sentence: "There hasn't been a moment's peace since the argument started."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Getting there hasn't been pretty.

Forbes

Turns out there hasn't been much progress.

Los Angeles Times

"There hasn't been anything".

The New York Times

There hasn't been any.

The New York Times

Because there hasn't been any.

The New York Times - Arts

There hasn't been much legislative change.

The New York Times

"There hasn't been a single problem".

The New York Times - Food

There hasn't been one yet".

The New York Times

There hasn't been any rowdiness.

The Guardian

There hasn't been any resolution".

The New York Times

"There hasn't been much change".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "there hasn't been" to clearly indicate the absence of something up to the present moment. It is suitable for both formal and informal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "there wasn't been". The correct structure is "there hasn't been", which uses the present perfect tense to indicate an absence that continues to the present.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "there hasn't been" functions as an existential construction combined with a negation. It asserts the non-existence or non-occurrence of something up to the present moment. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability in written English, exemplified by various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "there hasn't been" is a grammatically sound and frequently used phrase for indicating the absence or non-existence of something up to the present. It is versatile enough for various contexts, though most commonly found in news and media. Ludwig AI confirms its validity, highlighting its function in conveying a lack of occurrence or existence. While alternatives like "there has not been" exist for stylistic variation, the core meaning remains consistent. When writing, remember to use the correct tense and structure to avoid common errors.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

there has not been

Formal and direct negation of past existence or occurrence.

there's been no

Contraction offering a slightly more informal tone.

there was no

Shifts the timeframe slightly, focusing on a completed past period.

we haven't seen any

Changes the perspective to an observer, focusing on a lack of observation.

it's not happened

Focuses on the event itself not occurring.

none has occurred

More formal and emphatic way of stating that nothing has happened.

nothing has materialized

Implies an expectation that something should have happened but did not.

no one has witnessed

Focuses on the lack of observers or witnesses to an event.

it remains unseen

Highlights the continued absence of something being visible or apparent.

still waiting for

Emphasizes anticipation and the ongoing lack of fulfillment.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "there hasn't been" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using "there has not been". This maintains the same meaning but elevates the register.

What does "there hasn't been" imply about time?

The phrase "there hasn't been" implies that something has not occurred from a point in the past up to the present moment. It suggests a continuing absence.

Is "there hasn't been" suitable for academic writing?

Yes, "there hasn't been" is perfectly acceptable in academic writing, especially when discussing a lack of research or findings in a particular area. It is a clear and concise way to express this concept.

Can I use "there hasn't been" interchangeably with "there was no"?

While similar, "there hasn't been" focuses on a continuous period up to now, whereas "there was no" refers to a specific point or period in the past. The choice depends on the intended emphasis.