there has no

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "there has no" is not correct in written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when attempting to express the absence of something. Example: "There has no evidence to support that claim."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

42 human-written examples

Imagine: a permit to remove something that is not there has no charge.

The New York Times

Q: Under your definition of structural deficit, are you saying there has no increase?

The Guardian

"Why does he have to run against Rangel?" A minute later he hangs up, and Rangel, still sitting there, has no idea what's going on.

The New York Times - Books

The New Yorker, February 2 , 1946P. 13 Bartender in a Third Avenue saloon is sure one of the waiters there has no social life.

The New Yorker

"You don't ever want to come back to the corner and think that you are alone, and that the person there has no idea what they're talking about," she said.

The New York Times - Sports

Human rights activists in Ivory Coast said they doubted that Mr. Blé Goudé could receive a fair trial in that country, pointing out, for instance, that his lawyer there has no access to him.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

18 human-written examples

"The people there had no hope.

BBC

The money spent there had no limit.

The Guardian

There have no shortage of takers.

The Guardian

The family living there had no objection.

The New York Times

"There has been no water, no electricity.

Unicef

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating the absence of something, replace the phrase "there has no" with the grammatically correct alternatives such as "there is no" or "there are no", depending on whether you are referring to a singular or plural noun.

Common error

Avoid using "there has no" when referring to plural nouns. The correct form for plural nouns is "there are no" or "there have been no."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "there has no" is typically intended to function as an existential quantifier, indicating the absence of something. However, the construction is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig flags it as an error, suggesting replacement with grammatically correct alternatives.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "there has no" is a grammatically incorrect construction in English. While examples can be found, Ludwig AI identifies it as an error. Correct alternatives include "there is no" for singular nouns and "there are no" for plural nouns, or "there has been no" for the present perfect tense. Although the intent is to express the absence of something, the incorrect grammar makes it unsuitable for use in any formal or informal context. It's important to adhere to standard grammatical rules for clear and effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

there is no

Changes the verb conjugation to the correct form for singular nouns, indicating a singular absence.

there are no

Corrects the verb conjugation for plural nouns, indicating a plural absence.

there has been no

Adds "been" to create the correct present perfect tense, signifying a lack up to the present.

there is not any

Emphasizes the lack of something using "any" for added clarity.

there exists no

Uses a more formal verb to express the absence of something.

no evidence of

Focuses on the absence of evidence as opposed to a general lack.

lacks any

Uses a verb-centered construction to denote the absence of something.

is devoid of

Emphasizes a complete absence or lack of something.

does not have

Uses a more direct and active verb to indicate a lack.

is without

Highlights the state of being without something.

FAQs

How can I correctly use "there has no" in a sentence?

The phrase "there has no" is grammatically incorrect. Use "there is no" for singular nouns and "there are no" for plural nouns.

What's the difference between "there is no" and "there has no"?

"There is no" is grammatically correct and indicates the absence of something in the present. "There has no" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. Instead, use "there is no" or "there has been no" depending on the intended meaning.

Is "there has no" ever considered acceptable in English?

No, "there has no" is generally not considered acceptable in standard English. It's a grammatical error. Use the correct forms: "there is no" or "there are no".

What are some alternatives to "there has no" to express the absence of something?

You can use phrases like "there is no", "there are no", "there has been no", or simply "lacks" depending on the context.