Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(4)
There exists nothing that is brute, inert, and unthinking, and instead there is a continuum of creatures that exist on a spectrum from highly intelligent and active to largely dim and dull.
Hegel himself rejects this sort of doctrine —which he terms acosmism — and while it certainly amounts to a view that there exists nothing besides God, in view of its basic denial of the reality of the world we all experience it hardly seems like a kind of pantheism.
At its most general, pantheism may be understood positively as the view that God is identical with the cosmos, the view that there exists nothing which is outside of God, or else negatively as the rejection of any view that considers God as distinct from the universe.
In retrospect, however, it must be acknowledged that Descartes' classification of material substance with extension, as exemplified in his demand that there exists nothing in bodies except "certain dispositions of size, figure and motion", is so open-ended and equivocal as to easily accommodate both of the interpretations surveyed above.
Similar(56)
"Nothing out there exists".
I find it liberating to understand how everything is permissible not because the absence of God or Truth practically provides moral license for any and all action; instead, because everything expresses itself first as the potential for experience, there exists a "nothing" before actual things.
"I wanted to create a better frosting because nothing out there existed.
Nothing iscountable unless there exists a counter.
Nevertheless, there exist formulas for various performance measures in the steady state almost nothing is known about first (monotony) and second-order properties (convexity/concavity) of these measures.
At this very moment, were God not causing all that is to exist, there would be nothing at all.
On "30", as there is nothing exists higher than it but empty set ∂, so, it is meaningless to calculate its content.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com