there became no significant differences

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "there became no significant differences" is not correct in standard written English.
A more appropriate construction would be "there were no significant differences." Example: "After conducting the experiments, we found that there were no significant differences in the results between the two groups."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

In contrast, there became no significant differences in pathological findings of the resected specimen including tumor size, T classification, lymph node metastasis, and degrees of lymphatic, venous, and intrapancreatic nerve invasions between the two groups.

BioMed Research International

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

There are no significant differences between patients who became lost to follow-up and patients with complete follow-up.

Arthritis Research and Therapy

There were no significant differences.

The New York Times - Health

There are no significant differences across conditions.

Nature

However, there were no significant differences between the groups.

Nature

There were no significant differences in demographic or cardiorespiratory variables.

Nature

There were no significant differences between SAL and RSV alone.

Nature

Across gender, for instance, there were no significant differences.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

There were no significant differences in bleeding incidence or severity.

Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation

There were no significant differences between permeable cryoprotectants.

Cryobiology

There were no significant differences in thrombus weight before insonation.

European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When indicating a lack of significant difference, prefer the phrasing "there were no significant differences" or "no significant difference was found". This ensures grammatical correctness and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "became" when describing the absence of a difference. "Became" suggests a change over time. Instead, use "were" to indicate a state of being at a specific point or throughout a study.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "there became no significant differences" attempts to express a lack of statistically meaningful variations between groups or conditions. However, the use of "became" is grammatically questionable. Ludwig AI highlights this issue.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "there became no significant differences" aims to convey that there were no meaningful differences, it is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided. The preferred phrasing is "there were no significant differences", "no significant differences emerged", or similar alternatives. As Ludwig AI suggests, the word "became" is not appropriate in this context. It is crucial to use precise and grammatically sound language, particularly in scientific or formal writing. The context is mainly scientific, but the phrase's infrequent usage and grammatical issues suggest it is best to opt for more standard phrasing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

there were no significant differences

Uses the correct verb tense ("were" instead of "became") for standard English grammar.

no significant differences emerged

Replaces the passive construction with an active one, focusing on the emergence of differences.

no significant differences were found

Emphasizes the finding or discovery of differences, using a passive voice.

significant differences did not develop

Focuses on the lack of development of differences over time.

differences did not become significant

Highlights that initial differences did not reach statistical significance.

there wasn't a notable difference

Uses more informal language ("wasn't") and focuses on the notability of the difference.

no meaningful differences were observed

Stresses the meaningfulness, or lack thereof, of observed differences.

differences were statistically insignificant

Specifies that the differences lack statistical significance.

the groups showed no significant divergence

Emphasizes the lack of divergence or separation between groups.

outcomes were comparable

Focuses on the comparability of outcomes, implying a lack of significant difference.

FAQs

What's the correct way to say "there became no significant differences"?

The grammatically correct alternative is "there were no significant differences". The verb "became" is inappropriate in this context.

Is it acceptable to use "there became no significant difference" in formal writing?

No, it is not recommended. Use the standard phrasing "there were no significant differences" or "no significant difference was found" for formal contexts.

Can I use "no significant differences emerged" instead of "there became no significant differences"?

Yes, "no significant differences emerged" is a grammatically sound and often preferred alternative. It emphasizes the lack of developing differences.

What does it mean when studies report "there were no significant differences"?

It means that the observed variations between groups or conditions were not statistically significant enough to reject the null hypothesis. In simpler terms, the differences are likely due to random chance.