there are no discrepancy

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "there are no discrepancy" is correct in written English.
You can use it when you want to let someone know that there are no differences or inconsistencies between two things that you are comparing. For example, "I have reviewed the report and there are no discrepancies between my findings and those of the other team members."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Officials later told the Guardian there was "no discrepancy" because the president also said it could be longer.

The Guardian

A US campaign to suggest there is no discrepancy in standards between the two countries has been in high gear for some time, and was deployed again by various US spokesmen on the BBC yesterday, confusing the issue.

The Guardian - Opinion

There are no discrepancies about the advantages of achieving a sustainable energy system based on locally available natural resources.

Energy Policy

If there are no discrepancies, the market is arbitrage-free and the computed atomic prices can be used for all further calculations.

Stanford University

And since there are no discrepancies between the financial record and the physical record, material control is simpler and financial information is more accurate.

Harvard Business Review

It can be concluded that there are no discrepancies between psychodynamic views and experimental data, whether one tests psychotherapeutic approaches, discusses data from other fields such as psychopharmacology, or designs experiments based on psychodynamic theory.

Journal of Physiology-Paris

Make sure there are no discrepancies among your documents.

Forbes

No response will be relayed to the participating site if, upon review of submitted images, there are no discrepancies in assessment.

BMC Cancer

The effectiveness of psychoeducation in the short term (post-intervention or 3 months) has already been demonstrated [ 26, 30, 52] and there are no discrepancies between studies.

BMC Psychiatry

Overall, the results of these experiments indicate that although the phenotypes for the baz and baz EH747 alleles differ dramatically in the FE, there are no discrepancies in cellularizing embryos, embryonic epithelia, oocytes or neuroblasts.

Biology Open

We confirmed that there is no discrepancy between the proposed model and experimental results.

Combustion and Flame

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "there are no discrepancy" to clearly and concisely communicate that different sets of information are in agreement or alignment.

Common error

While grammatically sound, relying too heavily on negative constructions like "there are no discrepancy" can sometimes make writing sound overly formal or stiff. Consider using positive phrasing when it enhances clarity and flow.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "there are no discrepancy" functions as an assertion of agreement or consistency. It serves to negate the existence of differences between two or more sets of data, accounts, or observations. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "there are no discrepancy" is a grammatically correct expression used to assert consistency and agreement between different data points or accounts. While Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, it's important to note that the expression is relatively infrequent. Therefore, consider using it judiciously, especially in contexts where clarity and emphasis on thoroughness are crucial. When aiming for a more positive or less formal tone, alternatives like "the results align" or "everything is consistent" may be more appropriate. Though grammatically sound, remember to consider the subtle nuances in formality and context to ensure effective communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

there is complete agreement

Emphasizes full alignment and concurrence between different elements.

there is perfect consistency

Highlights the flawless uniformity and lack of variation across different instances.

the findings are consistent

Focuses on the alignment of results or observations, suggesting reliability.

there is no inconsistency

Directly negates the presence of any disparities or contradictions.

the data aligns perfectly

Highlights the precise match and arrangement of data points.

everything is in accordance

Indicates that all elements are in harmony and agreement with each other.

the accounts match

Emphasizes the equivalence between different reports or explanations.

there are no contradictions

Directly states the absence of conflicting information or statements.

the results are congruent

Focuses on the similarity and agreement between different sets of results.

all aspects are uniform

Highlights the identical nature and lack of diversity across different elements.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "there are no discrepancy" to sound more positive?

You could say "the results align", "the data matches", or "everything is consistent" for a more affirmative tone.

Is "there are no discrepancy" appropriate for formal writing?

Yes, "there are no discrepancy" is suitable for formal contexts, such as academic reports or professional correspondence, where precision and clarity are essential.

What's the difference between "there are no discrepancy" and "there isn't a discrepancy"?

"There are no discrepancy" is generally used when referring to multiple potential discrepancies or multiple sets of data being compared. "There isn't a discrepancy" is used when referring to a single, specific point of potential disagreement.

When should I use "there are no discrepancy" versus more direct alternatives?

Use "there are no discrepancy" when you want to emphasize the thoroughness of your review or comparison, assuring the audience that all potential inconsistencies have been examined and found to be absent. More direct alternatives may be appropriate for less formal or less critical contexts.