This motivates the claim of FA theory that for something to be delicious is for it to merit gustatory pleasure.
In her latest novel Rebecca Newberger Goldstein envisions an intellectually sublime creature who is named Lucinda Mandelbaum, known as "the Goddess of Game Theory" and famed for something called the Mandelbaum Equilibrium, which is one of the non-Nash equilibria in zero-sum games.
Fitting attitude theories hold that for something to be valuable is for it to merit some relevant evaluative attitude.
By the end, Beck, who was transparent in his hopes for health-care-conspiracy-theory fodder, was begging for something, anything he could use (" I don't care. Any kind of corruption") and then was just apologizing: America, I've got to shoot straight with you: I think I've wasted your time.
But The Theory of Everything is trying for something more real, true and intimate in its study of the compromises made within a marriage with unique pressures.
The theory that if you wish for something often enough it might come true has a corollary: If you harp relentlessly on an agenda, many people will soon wish that you and your pet cause would go for a long walk.
In support of the theory that every place is famous for something, Le Roy, N.Y., was the birthplace of Jell-O in 1897.
With a smile the director batted away the idea, raised by his interviewer, that the lone visitor to the house, a neighbor who drops in for a drink and spins a pessimistic theory of the world, might stand for something larger: "No, he is just a neighbor who has no alcohol anymore".
According to generic FA theory, by contrast, what it is for something to be good is for it to be a fitting object of some pro-attitude such as desire or approval.
This observation may count as evidence for something, perhaps for some theory the physicist is trying to test.
