Candidates would, in theory, be accountable to the public for all the spending on their behalf; but their obligations to their donors might be all the greater.
Neither of these theories was accountable to the history of science in the following important sense: If it turned out that the history of science exemplified few or no decisions in accordance with, say, Carnap's confirmationism, then so much the worse for the history of science.
In the draft Clarke said: In theory, academies are accountable to the secretary of state, but in practice the accountability can almost amount to benign neglect where educational and financial performance seems to indicate everything is fine.
The draft states: "In theory, academies are accountable to the secretary of state, but in practice the accountability can almost amount to benign neglect where educational and financial performance seems to indicate everything is fine".
Clarke's report puts some of the blame on this detachment: "In theory, academies are accountable to the secretary of state, but in practice the accountability can almost amount to benign neglect where educational and financial performance seems to indicate everything is fine".
The Guardian reports that he writes: "In theory, academies are accountable to the secretary of state, but in practice the accountability can amount to benign neglect where educational and financial performance seems to indicate everything is fine.
In theory, prosecutors are accountable to voters.
Unlike Exxon Mobil the government is, at least in theory, a publicly accountable institution.
Donors, investors these are the people who, in theory, hold NGOs accountable for their work in foreign countries.
In theory, Russia is accountable to this court, but when they ignore its authority, the world, like the Olympic Committees are doing now, has shrugged (as it shrugged when Russia nixed the request that Sochi, like Vancouver, host a Pride House for LGBT athletes and supporters).
