Some theorists concerned with environmental issues also discuss our rights with respect to natural resources.
Feminist theorists are therefore currently in active conversation with critical race theorists (Alcoff, Ahmed, Gilman, Gooding-Williams), theorists of (dis)ability (Inahara, Garland Thompson, Thomas, Wendell), and theorists concerned with aging, health and illness (Inahara, Mairs, Toombs).
That has led to a growing movement of theorists concerned about algorithmic accountability, of ensuring that we both understand how an algorithm makes a decision, and that the decision-making is legally non-discriminatory.
Some theorists concerned with nonconceptual content at the subpersonal level have favored a broadly teleological account of what this content consists in (drawing upon the teleological theory of content developed in Millikan 1984).
In particular, those theorists concerned with the multi-dimensional nature of social and cultural "difference" have stressed how the conception of the autonomous person assumed in such principles (as well as criteria for rational discourse and public deliberation) is a contestable ideal not internalized by all participants in contemporary political life (see, e.g., Brown 1995, Benhabib 1992).
Conspiracy theorists concerned with surveillance abuse believe that the New World Order is being implemented by the cult of intelligence at the core of the surveillance-industrial complex through mass surveillance and the use of Social Security numbers, the bar-coding of retail goods with Universal Product Code markings, and, most recently, RFID tagging by microchip implants.
First, at the beginning, when the metaphysician is concerned to formulate his main thesis; here there is a move from what holds in a restricted sphere (the sphere of physics, for example) to what is supposed to hold generally, a move that is possible only if the theorist concerned has an interest in the sphere in question.
A second debate among theorists concerns the degree to which motivational processes are innate (genetically programmed) versus acquired (learned).
One factor that clearly drives all of these mesh theorists' concerns is the need to account for such phenomena as weakness of will and compulsion.
Those theorists were concerned with the correspondence between free market outcomes and social welfare optimization.
