theoretical arguments

USAGE SUMMARY

"theoretical arguments" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to claims or ideas that are based on logic and theory rather than on experimentation or observation. For example, "His theoretical arguments were convincing, but we still need to conduct experiments to prove his hypothesis."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Amusing (or occasionally frightening) examples make theoretical arguments instantly accessible.

The Economist

The theoretical arguments for torture are slippery and dangerous.

The New York Times

"I agree with all the theoretical arguments for performing it," Mr. Oliver said.

The New York Times - Arts

Never mind theoretical arguments: how did she and Mr. Bloomberg get along?

The New York Times

As the Depression deepened, seeming to confirm his warnings, Keynes sharpened his theoretical arguments.

The New Yorker

"I learned that you can disagree, even fight, without confusing theoretical arguments with personal attacks".

The New York Times

Their theoretical arguments tend to fly over the head of the typical taxpayer.

The New York Times

00jebus: Some anacdotal evidence to go along with the theoretical arguments of others; I went to a catholic school.

The Guardian

But most of it concentrates on the theoretical arguments behind even the most minute-sounding differences in military dictums.

The New York Times - Books

Extant theoretical arguments predict contrasting effects.

Research Policy

But Socrates' theoretical arguments on behalf of justice are finished.

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting "theoretical arguments", clearly distinguish them from empirical evidence. Make sure that the theoretical basis is clearly stated before you start the argument.

Common error

Avoid presenting "theoretical arguments" as established facts. Always acknowledge their hypothetical nature and the need for empirical validation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "theoretical arguments" functions primarily as a noun phrase. It refers to a set of reasoned claims or propositions based on abstract principles rather than concrete evidence. Ludwig confirms that the phrase is correct and usable, showcasing its established presence in academic and professional discourse.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

52%

News & Media

30%

Formal & Business

8%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Reference

3%

Social Media

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "theoretical arguments" is a grammatically sound and frequently used noun phrase, as confirmed by Ludwig. It is most commonly found in formal and scientific contexts, where it serves to present reasoned claims based on abstract principles. While "theoretical arguments" are valuable for exploring new ideas, remember to distinguish them from empirical evidence. Ludwig's analysis of real-world examples offers guidance on how to effectively incorporate this phrase into your writing. When in doubt, consider alternatives like "conceptual framework" or "logical reasoning" to best fit your desired meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

theoretical considerations

Similar, but highlights the act of thinking about theoretical aspects.

reasoned analysis

Focuses on a structured and logical evaluation, often academic in nature.

logical reasoning

Emphasizes the process of constructing arguments based on logic.

abstract reasoning

Highlights the abstract and non-concrete nature of the arguments.

conceptual framework

Focus shifts to the underlying structure or system of ideas.

philosophical justifications

Specifies that the arguments are rooted in philosophy.

intellectual debates

Focuses on the discussions and disagreements surrounding theoretical topics.

hypothetical scenarios

Emphasizes the speculative and unproven nature of the arguments.

speculative claims

Highlights the uncertainty and lack of definitive proof in the arguments.

doctrinal principles

Implicates the underlying beliefs which shape arguments.

FAQs

How can I effectively present "theoretical arguments" in writing?

Clearly state the assumptions and principles upon which your "theoretical arguments" are based. Provide logical reasoning and evidence to support your claims, while acknowledging potential limitations or counterarguments.

What is the difference between "theoretical arguments" and empirical evidence?

"Theoretical arguments" are based on reasoning and logic, while empirical evidence is based on observation and experimentation. Both are valuable, but they serve different purposes in supporting a claim. When you present "empirical evidence", you're relying on concrete data. "Theoretical arguments" often lay the groundwork for future empirical investigation.

What are some alternatives to the phrase "theoretical arguments"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "conceptual framework", "logical reasoning", or "theoretical considerations". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

When is it appropriate to use "theoretical arguments" in academic writing?

"Theoretical arguments" are appropriate when you are developing new ideas, challenging existing assumptions, or exploring the implications of a particular theory. Ensure that your arguments are well-reasoned and supported by relevant literature.