Identifying those peaks and then verifying that they are indeed unclimbed, however, is a challenge unto itself.
By asking you to work out and then verifying that you actually rolled off the couch and out to the gym.
Then, verifying that the subdigraph ({mathcal{G}^{prime }}) induced by (V_{mathcal{G}^{prime }}) on ({mathcal{G}}) is strongly connected is possible in polynomial time from Proposition 1.
Then, verifying if a set of properties, expressed in temporal logics, are valid in the designed model, using a model checker.
We propose to use an association-based review procedure to identify design issues by first associating all the relevant design concerns, problems and solutions systematically; and then verifying if the causal relationships between these design elements are valid.
The model is tested in the study watersheds by first calibrating it against observed flow hydrograph for a single event, and then verifying it for three additional storm events using both point (gauged) and continuous (radar) rainfall data.
