Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Forward-looking determinism then entails that these past states beyond our control, perhaps occurring long before humans even existed determine everything we do in our lives.
This, together with (2), (3), and (4) then entails that God has the power to eliminate all evil, that God knows when evil exists, and that God has the desire to eliminate all evil.
It follows from (3.5) that LR H, H*; E) = 1 and LR ~H, ~H*; ~E) > 1. (3.4) then entails that any learning experience that raises E's probability must result in a posterior with Q(H) > Q(H*).
Assuming one updates credences by conditionalising, this form of the Principle Principle then entails that when rational agents come to know the chances, their credences are equal to the chances when they have no inadmissible information about the outcome.
Similar(56)
which entails that (2.18) holds by (i).
If the Principle holds of necessity then that entails that it is possible that A = B.
Many philosophers accept the principle that if an agent has the power to bring about a state of affairs, then this entails that, possibly, the agent brings about that state of affairs.
Second, psychologism seems to entail that sentences about very large numbers (in particular, numbers that no one has ever had a thought about) are not true; for if none of us has ever had a thought about some very large number, then psychologism entails that there is no such number and, hence, that no sentence about that number could be true.
If the entailment relation in question is an appropriately relevant relation, then, plausibly, T entails that a, or some Ks, really exist just in case a, or some Ks, are partial truthmakers for T. In that case, the above criteria can be seen as substituting partial truthmaking for truthmaking as a condition of ontological commitment.
Then, the tp entails that four things were done and the cp entails that three things were done.
And if there is just one power, then either determinism entails that we lack this power or it does not.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com