Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
The five collaboration themes were assessed at T0 and T1.
All health themes were assessed by subject-matter experts; 1 5 (mean: 3.1) per theme.
Patterns between themes were assessed to identify relationships across and within the differential categories.
A limitation of this study is that only a limited number of themes were assessed in which pharmacists should have adequate knowledge, and within those themes, not all aspects were studied.
Similar(56)
Inter-rater reliability for each theme was assessed using Cohen's kappa (kappas ranged from.90 - 1.00, indicating excellent agreement).
The first core theme was "assessing the situation of people with diabetes from a different perspective".
A central theme was assessing preferences for receiving results and perceptions of their value.
The second superordinate theme was assessing the manageability of the situation, which was affected by factors as diverse as severity of PDD, relationship between mother and father, and social support and acceptance for PDD.
The first theme was "assessing the situation of people with diabetes from a different perspective", with the subthemes "an expanded perspective of practice and higher level of reflection", "applying critical thinking in practice" and "changing patient-nurse relationships in diabetes care".
After excluding themes that were assessed as duplicates, replaceable or less important, 40 themes were suggested, organised in seven units.
Articles deemed relevant for inclusion underwent systematic data extraction to identify overarching themes and were assessed for their methodological quality.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com