The first core theme was "assessing the situation of people with diabetes from a different perspective".
A central theme was assessing preferences for receiving results and perceptions of their value.
The second superordinate theme was assessing the manageability of the situation, which was affected by factors as diverse as severity of PDD, relationship between mother and father, and social support and acceptance for PDD.
The first theme was "assessing the situation of people with diabetes from a different perspective", with the subthemes "an expanded perspective of practice and higher level of reflection", "applying critical thinking in practice" and "changing patient-nurse relationships in diabetes care".
The five collaboration themes were assessed at T0 and T1.
All health themes were assessed by subject-matter experts; 1 5 (mean: 3.1) per theme.
Patterns between themes were assessed to identify relationships across and within the differential categories.
A limitation of this study is that only a limited number of themes were assessed in which pharmacists should have adequate knowledge, and within those themes, not all aspects were studied.
20 31323336373839418 39 41 In the study by Yates and James, the outcome for which an ethnic difference was reported (theme C) was assessed with a combination of written, online, oral presentation, and coursework.
This type of question was also reported to be more discriminating than other types of question: " When it was factual recall they were scoring around 40% plus correct, soon as you put in a vignette they dropped below 25%." Clinical capability (Theme 1.1.2) was assessed using different methods.
