Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(18)
Maybe their science is built on hocus-pocus!
"I said, basically, 'You are stupid.' Their science is very weak.
While their science is up to date, their narrative and stylistic strategies are comfortably old-fashioned.
We should be very careful about criticising other scientists, except when their science is clearly at fault.
The great climate science centres around the world are more than well aware how weak their science is.
Even if their science is excellent, it's probably not worth it.
Similar(42)
Some thought that their science was above politics.
Dr. Egan judges them without sympathy: he says their science was bad, and their continuing influence worse.
Following the great discoveries of the 19th century in electricity, magnetism, and thermodynamics, many physicists in the 1880s were saying that their science was coming to an end like an exhausted mine.
Not only was their science being insulted, but the future of the company was also at risk.
"Instead of the community coming up with proposals for NSF, they would go directly to you, and insist that their science was the most important".
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com