A fundamental requirement lies in designing suitable processes and performance indicators to help companies in monitoring their current and future results and the critical trends of the beneath processes.
Moreover, all ongoing studies designed on the basis of these concepts and assessment strategies will not be able to publish their future responsiveness results.
Yet upon framing them, and the performance lift each gives the other, it is ironic to think that while everyone is expected to master the reading of a P&L, even MBAs don't graduate knowing these new competencies which will drive the future results their P&L will then measure.
Therefore, in hyperbolic discounting, subjects underestimate their future impulsivity, resulting in preference reversal as time passes (also referred to as dynamic inconsistency, see Appendix I) [ 6, 7].
Fidelity and American Century note that in recent weeks, they have added stronger caveats to the usual "past performance is no guarantee of future results" in their fine print.
If their latest May Day demonstrations are any indicator of future results, then maybe not.
"Past performance is no guarantee of future results".
Mr. Yun cautioned that future results might be more modest.
Finally, past performance is no guarantee of future results.
But several issues raised concerns about future results.
