Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Mosquitoes injected with 600 ng of AgamOBP7-dsRNA were also analyzed, but no change was recorded in their EAG responses to any of the four ligands tested.
Similar(59)
Two most female abundant olfactory tissue specific OBPs, AfunOBP1 and AfunOBP3, were expressed, purified, characterized, and their affinity towards EAG active compounds was examined by using binding assay experiments.
These 11 compounds, along with the standard 1-octen-3-ol, were further evaluated for their dose-dependent EAG response at 1, 10 and 100 µg source dose (Fig. 2).
Based on Fig. 1, if low-HGI patients are intensively managed to a low eAG target, their MBG would presumably remain above the target, inadvertently leaving these patients at unnecessary risk for chronic complications.
We examine their expression levels in both sexes and seek evidence for their function by relating their expression with levels of EAG response in male and female antennae to 58 host and non-host plant volatiles and sex pheromone components.
The mechanism of Ca2+/CaM regulation of KCNQ channels is therefore different from that of EAG channels, despite their structural and electrophysiological similarities.
Patients may still get confused that the "average" glucose on their own meters does not match the eAG.
Eag1 channels play an important role in synaptic physiology as suggested by the phenotype of eag mutants in Drosophila [8], however, their synaptic function in vertebrates is unknown.
Conversely, intensive management could drive MBG in high-HGI patients below the eAG target, which presumably would increase their risk for hypoglycemia.
EAG-family channels are structurally characterized by the presence of the highly conserved EAG or PAS (Per-Arnt-Sim) domain in their N-termini [9].
Three recombinant A. gambiae OBPs (r-OBPs), r-OBP1, r-OBP20 and r-OBP48 were examined for their binding capacities of 22 putative ligands known to elicit EAG responses in A. gambiae females (Table S1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com