TYRANTS tend to be oddly punctilious about recording their atrocities.
When the war ended, its leaders fled, fearing prosecution for their atrocities against the Armenians.
The terrorists have specific aims, deploying their atrocities for a political cause.
They don't seek to hide their atrocities, rather to post them online.
We have seen their atrocities in Tikrit and Jurf al-Sakher against isolated civilians.
My thoughts turn to the many collaborators, Romanian and Ukrainian, who assisted the Romanian and German armies in their atrocities.
The Seleka kept up their atrocities: burning people alive, killing hospital patients, throwing bound prisoners off bridges to drown.
He says: "Isis's psychological tactics, spreading terror through their atrocities, no longer works as [they] once did".
Perhaps this is why the "royal" dictators have received a more muted response to their atrocities from the British government.
Taylor's logistical support of the rebels in Sierra Leone was not intended to facilitate their atrocities, his lawyers argued.
Jihadi groups intend their atrocities to provoke an overreaction, and very few governments can resist falling into the trap.
