The phrase "their argumentation" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to the way someone presents their arguments or reasoning. Example: "Their argumentation was logical and well-supported, convincing the jury to rule in their favor."
"She likes to have an eclectic group of people around her who are not ad hominem in their argumentation, people who can make compelling arguments," Mr. Myers said.
We examined how the students used the tools to read and write arguments and how this affected their argumentation skills.
Research carried out by Jimenez-Alexiandre, Rodrigues, and Duschl, (2000) showed that students often found it challenging and demanding when constructing argument on their own although their argumentation skills could be improved through various forms of intervention.
The goal we pursue in our research is to generate questions automatically in order to support students in developing their own arguments for a given discussion topic so that they could improve their argumentation ability and would be more active in a discussion session.
Their argumentation is shallow as well as pretentious.
There is also an "emotional stake that philosophers often have and betray in their argumentation", which "it's dangerous and also even verges on offensive to draw attention" to.
Nowadays, most argumentation systems build their arguments on the basis of a single, fixed knowledge base, often under the form of a logic program as in Defeasible Logic Programming or in Assumption-Based Argumentation.
They do have different weight in their philosophical argumentation, however, since only establishing that conceptual dependence does not have a foundation is sufficient for establishing the absence of svabhāva in the comprehensive sense intended by the Madhyamaka philosophers.
Studies which draw normative conclusions from empirical results often have a cryptonormative character, which means that they implicitly take normative statements as the basis of their ethical argumentation without mentioning or reflecting on them.
A final advantage is that because of the explicit use of evidence and the use of visualizations, decision makers can use the model to communicate their decision (argumentation) to stakeholders.
eStudies that explicitly rely on (vast) empirical research (results) for their ethical argumentation, but do not engage in empirical research themselves, should also be considered when discussing issues of quality in EE research.
