Though their approaches differ, both call for changes in the operation of the patent office, agree that access to broadband must be expanded and advocate steps to encourage technically trained foreigners to enter and stay in the United States.
We wanted to examine to what extent it is possible to recover the correct distribution of conformations based only on a set of experimental data, and whether different structure determination approaches differ in their ability to recover the distributions.
As the various experimental approaches differ in their origins and serve different purposes, there is a need to organize the field.
These approaches differ in their resolution and ability to budget the major components of the fine-sediment cascade in glaciated environments.
The challenges faced by such approaches differ in their level of severity, and are influenced in this respect by the actual AM process chosen.
Furthermore, the methods are either limited to boundary representations with the smallest misorientation angles or take into account all symmetrically equivalent boundary representations, and these two approaches differ in their meaning, physical significance and conclusions.
Although the Bayesian and prudential approaches differ in their aims and scope, both lay down fruitful avenues for further exploration that are largely complementary.
Such approaches differ in their resolution ability, sensitivity, and dynamic range [ 79], which may account for discrepancies between our study and earlier work at the level of individual proteins (e.g., see Additional files 7 and 8).
The two aforementioned approaches differ in their typical treatment of stochasticity, inclusion of density dependence, and assumption of demographics prior to the onset of drug treatment (equilibrium versus exponential growth; cost of resistance).
Their approach differs from other approaches in measuring the system performance since it has considered asymmetric costs of errors rather than prediction accuracy in intrusion detection.
In recent years several authors have revisited the thought that compatibilism may be defended by a broadly hypothetical theory of ability, but their approach differs in important ways from more traditional approaches.
