Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The weak conclusion, however, is that the evidence indicates that responses to remaining differences are not changed when the average of a characteristic increases.
Similar(59)
However we are not in a position to comment on that paper, and so draw the weaker conclusion that the historical record offers no reason to doubt the estimates of climate sensitivity from climate models.
What I mean is that furthermore, the argument for this weak conclusion is weak.
This would strengthen the fairly weak conclusion of a "direct" activity of MUL1 on Mfn. 3) The lack of mitochondrial fusion in their drp1 RNAi in Figure 4P needs to be omitted or addressed in much more detail.
This would strengthen the fairly weak conclusion of a "direct" activity of MUL1 on Mfn.
But I do not think these concerns support any more than the rather weak conclusion that, sometimes, attempting or engaging in noncognitive moral enhancement will be impermissible.
I then respond individually to his three concerns, arguing that they license only the very weak conclusion that moral enhancement via direct emotion modulation is sometimes impermissible.
So despite the fact that Socrates draws this weaker conclusion, it seems to me that the argument he's offered us, if it works at all, entitles us to draw the bolder conclusion.
As Chalmers emphasizes, most materialists will reject even this weaker conclusion, since it denies that phenomenal properties can be explained by the structural and causal properties studied by the physical sciences.
In this way, instead of reaching a weak conclusion – we cannot know for sure if a given clade A exists – we can make the strong claim that another group B is certainly not an appropriate unit in any natural classification.
But then, unless he can say something substantive about when or how often it is impermissible, he will be left with a rather weak conclusion: that noncognitive moral enhancement is sometimes morally impermissible.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com