We might as well call this vision of development the "visible hand" of capitalism, for it has the original theory backward.
"The vision of global development is at a critical juncture, and the need to move beyond 'business as usual' is stronger than ever," it says.
The vision of sustainable development must by definition include both long-term considerations and the global dimension [1, 2].
A design science of sustainable enterprise seeks to marry scientific and practitioner knowledge to guide the creation of enterprises (a meso-scale social artifact) that will contribute to a future consistent with the vision of sustainable development.
The ideas and definitions surrounding the vision of sustainable development are many and various.
Strategic spatial planning tools saw their greatest success with the 2004 reform, as a potential hinge for the vision of economic-territorial development processes supported by Tony Blair's Labour government (Healey 2010).
Yet "The World We Want"—the vision of the post-2015 development goals—speaks to much more than the completion of the MDG agenda [ 3].
According to social scientist and former president of Mexico's transparency commission, Jacqueline Peschard, the paltry increase is indicative of the insignificant role social justice plays in the government's vision of development.
They also ignore the politics of development innovation: questions of who gains, and who loses, and how these differences will be navigated dissolve away in the friction-free technocratic vision of development.
It's true that a few people have either bought into the vision of a new housing development or want to move away, but a huge majority (over 80%) are backing the staying put and refurbishment option.
