Sentence examples for the utterance by from inspiring English sources

where O i is the likelihood that word V i is recognized in the utterance by the speech recognition module.

A sentence's truth value, in a particular context, is determined by its informational content, by contextual circumstances related to, 'fitted to' the utterance by aspects of the speakers' practice, and finally by the mind and language-independent world.

Each utterance is then represented as a sequence of N such vectors, V = ν 1, ν 2, …, ν N, (where N is the number of voiced segments in the utterance) by the front-end.

Concerning the lottery example (36), Weiner (2005: 236) explains the apparent unacceptability of the utterance by appeal to Grice's maxim of Manner: putting it categorically, as in (36), instead of in terms of high probability, legitimizes the inference that A has more information than what was known before the draw.

In this approach, it is reported that the appropriate size of a sliding window producing comparable results compared to the utterance-by-utterance based approach is about 600 ms for these feature compensation techniques [13].

The feature compensation and model adaptation techniques employed in this experiment are basically conducted in the utterance-by-utterance basis to estimate the required statistics such as mean and variance.

Specifically, phoneme posteriorgrams [72] were computed for the queries and the utterances by means of a long temporal context-based phoneme recognizer [73].

Even though the utterances by participant [33] show that s/he is strongly opposed to the TOE as an uninformed anti-evolutionist, this application creates an inquiry and cognitive interrogation process for the individual.

In summary, the front end estimates the self-normalization warp for the incoming utterance by using the self-normalization warp estimated from the earlier utterances via a recursive averaging with a forgetting factor.

When the dialog does, however, not point to the existence of a focus (condition GG) listeners are expected to structure the target utterance by means of the internal major prosodic boundaries.

Just as "Bert is carrying a gun" can be made true, in the pretense relevant to this utterance, by Bert's holding a twig, so, on this view on metaphor, can Romeo's "Juliet is the sun" be made true by features of Juliet and of the relation between Romeo and Juliet, given the pretense that Romeo's utterance makes relevant.