Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
Sixty-nine percent of physicians who reported not having discussions indicated they were more likely to screen African American patients for prostate cancer, compared to 50% of physicians who reported the use of discussions (Chi-square(1) = 1.62, p =.20).
Similar(58)
In this section the results of the student questionnaires, the use of discussion boards, and the assessment data are first discussed.
Research on the use of discussion boards as a resource was conducted from 2008 to 2011 (Gregory 2015).
The research focus in this paper dealt with students learning online through the use of discussion boards, wikis and 3D virtual worlds.
But there are also problems related to the use of discussion forums in Internet-based treatments.
Two case studies [ 28, 29] found significant improvements in knowledge acquisition (measured by students' final marks) through the use of discussion boards.
The social media tools studied are outlined in table 3. The use of discussion boards and online support groups (combined as discussion forums due to their common structure and intent) dominated the literature, encompassing 189 (66.6%) included studies.
Three studies investigated feedback related to the use of discussion boards [ 30, 39, 41]; all combined analysis of discussion boards with other technologies such as chat, website, or e-diary.
Of the first 100 websites listed in the search results, 78 were primarily focused on the sale of kratom, while 22 were focused on disseminating information about kratom through the use of discussion boards [ 5].
Two studies conducted in populations with chronic health conditions evaluated Zora, a virtual world [ 16, 17], and the remaining eight studies investigated the use of discussion forums (Table 2) [ 13- 15, 18- 22].
Similarly, 91% of physicians who reported not having discussions indicated they are more likely to screen patients with a family history of prostate cancer, compared to 46% of those who reported the use of discussion (Chi-square(1) = 13.27, p <.001).
More suggestions(15)
the use of interactions
the use of talk
the use of examination
the use of dialogue
the termination of discussions
the lack of discussions
the subject of discussions
the establishment of discussions
the substance of discussions
the host of discussions
the forefront of discussions
the management of discussions
the heart of discussions
the progress of discussions
the end of discussions
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com