Sentence examples for the uniform allocation from inspiring English sources

It was found that a suitable cross-sectional distance of less than 3 km should be adopted when simulating hyperconcentrated floods, and the results using the uniform allocation mode can agree better with measurements than other two allocation modes.

Although, in the first case (1), we can simplify the problem using the optimal power uniform allocation for each SUq, an analytical solution seems difficult or even impossible to find since, as opposed to the perfectly symmetric case, we can no longer conclude from the KKT conditions that the number of allocated bands is the same for all SUs.

This is not the case under uniform allocation.

It also outperforms the uniform bit allocation and uniform bit allocation with normalized energy in the order of 1.7 2 and 0.3 1.4 dB, respectively.

It can be observed that the achieved capacity using the proposed optimal power allocation method outperforms the capacity obtained with uniform allocation.

In Fig. 8, the computation time of the algorithms is shown as a function of the number of subcarriers N. We notice a slight increase in computation time for the optimized energy allocation (UB+OE) compared to the uniform energy allocation (UB+UE).

This is why we use the uniform gain allocation instead of the conventional power allocation in the proposed relay selection based approach.

We chose to use the uniform gain allocation instead of the conventional power allocation because the former has better performance than the latter in the terms of capacity, which will be discussed in the simulation section.

However, generally PA 1 still seems to have a better performance and can be used instead of the uniform power allocation, PA 2. The adaptive power allocation method PA 3 considered has a slightly better performance than the proposed power allocation strategy.

For example, if N c is the number of individuals allocated to the change class, and the diagonal of C is the vector (N c / K, …, N c / K ), then this would imply a perfect uniform allocation of the N c individuals over the K components.

Indeed, the null hypothesis of non-uniform allocation for IS distribution does not substantially change the results we have obtained based on the hypothesis of a random uniform allocation for CIS formation in our clinical samples (Table 2), as is shown in Table 3.