Sentence examples for the two software packages from inspiring English sources

Two years ago, a Federal appeals panel found that the bundling did not appear to violate Section 1 and reversed an injunction by Judge Jackson that had ordered the company to separate the two software packages.

Another major difference between the two software packages was the time taken to complete the analysis.

Statistical analyses were then performed to compare SUV measurements from the two software packages and to explore reproducibility of measurements.

In this last case, the maximum difference found between the two software packages was of 9% between ICAs left (1.57 for TeraRecon iNtuition™ versus 1.71 for OsiriX®).

Statistically significant differences in SUV measurements, between the two software packages, ranging from 9 to 21.8% were found depending on ROI location.

Based on their results statistically significant differences in SUV measurements, between the two software packages, ranging from 9 to 21.8% were found depending on ROI location.

A comparison was also made of the meshes generated by the five software packages (Focus-Inspection, Metris, VxScan, Mimics and Atos) of the five digitization systems for the three calibrated pieces and two more complex pieces (a bone and an automobile window winder pulley) to determine meshing quality.

The performances for the three software packages calculated as the areas under the ROC curves are presented in Table 2.

Of the six software packages that we study, four implement the computation of the dual algorithm, and four implement the standard algorithm.

There are considerable differences in performance between the three software packages with 4DM showing the best performance and ECTb the worst.

The three software packages have different approaches to handle the difficult basal region, with different methods for delineation of the left ventricle (Figure 1).