Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Overall, validation analyses showed that the two instruments were comparable.
Similar(59)
Although the agreement of amplitudes between the instruments varies among the subjects (R = 0.43), the two instruments are comparable as the 95% confidence interval of the slope of the regression line contains 1.0 (95% CI = 0.32 1.11).
By converting the implicit times into Z-scores, the two instruments are now more comparable (Fig. 3c).
We find better scale-functioning in HSCL-10, and find that the two screening instruments were comparable in many respects, but not all.
Comparison between the two settings showed that, though the populations were not identical in terms of demographics and characteristics of the final stay, results according to the study instruments were comparable.
This indicates that the difference between the instruments is comparable on the same occasion.
The final Portuguese version was then evaluated by a team of three teachers and three Portuguese oncology experts to ensure that the semantic, idiomatic, cultural, and conceptual aspects of the instrument were comparable to those of the original version.
Global quality of life parameters based on the EORTC QLQ-C30 instrument were comparable in both arms.
The instrument is equipped with state-of-the-art components, and the performance of the instrument is comparable to that of advanced SANS instruments.
Two instruments are planned.
Two instruments are condition-specific HRQL instruments.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com