The two contexts of state or only output availability are considered.
By comparing the transcriptome of DG neurons activated in the two contexts, we identified a unique transcriptional signature that selects DG neurons for reactivation.
The following paper focuses on this general notion and compares it with empirical findings concerning the epistemic cultures prevalent in the two contexts.
The law has been used to impose a distinction between the two contexts, but this distinction may not always be as clear in the practice of clinical genomics.
Because of resource differences between the two contexts, researchers need to clarify what aspects of the work environments are similar and different.
We found that identical visual stimuli give rise to differences in noise correlation in the two contexts, suggesting that MT neurons receive inputs of central origin whose strength changes with the task structure.
Their differences reveal important ways that market forces and market-oriented interests shape threats as well as solutions to meeting forest protection and livelihood objectives in the two contexts, but produce unpredictable partnerships and awkward contradictions in the process.
Of course, the two contexts are very different: Companies usually engage with few customers at a time, not a large online community; they use traditional face-to-face interactions, rather than a technology platform; and their choice of partners is driven by specific business goals, rather than by engagement and passion for a brand or product category.
However, given the lower levels of air pollution in developed countries, these estimates may not be externally valid to the developing country context if there is a non-linear dose relationship between pollution and mortality or if the costs of avoidance behaviour differ considerably between the two contexts.
However, given the lower levels of air pollution in developed countries, these estimates may not be externally valid to the developing country context if there is a nonlinear dose relationship between pollution and mortality or if the costs of avoidance behavior differs considerably between the two contexts.
Are there significant differences across the two contexts?
