Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(2)
Dimensional analysis and surface roughness of the tools were evaluated after thermal cycling.
The tools were evaluated on the NaCTeM Metabolites corpus [28] in a 10-fold cross validation manner [23].
Similar(58)
The tools are evaluated using five criteria that can assist analysts in selecting the most appropriate tools for each project.
Performance of the tools was evaluated by estimating the parameters of 'precision' (TP/ TP + FP)) and 'recall' (TP/ TP + FN)) [ 72, 73].
After several months of use by climbers around the world, the efficacies of these tools were evaluated by comparing pre- and post-training climbing performance.
The tool was evaluated by users and the qualitative results of the evaluation are presented in the article.
The performance of the tool is evaluated with respect to the aforementioned measurements.
The tool was evaluated using preimplementation and postimplementation cohorts at a single urban academic teaching hospital.
The tool was evaluated with three real-world use cases from different domains including seismic analysis and agronomy.
Besides, the tool is evaluated through a study case based on a real railway route, obtaining an overall improvement of 82.33% in time invested over the existing process.
The tool was evaluated using video-recordings of teams managing PPH in both real-life and simulated settings.A Delphi panel consisting of 12 obstetricians from the UK, Norway, Sweden, Iceland, and Denmark achieved consensus on (i) the elements to include in the assessment tool, (ii) the weighting of each element, and (iii) the final tool.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com