Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(28)
For R = −1, the three methodologies resulted in similar levels of crack tip shielding.
Comparing the LS factor calculated with the three methodologies (UCA, FCL and LS-TOOL), LS-TOOL delivers encouraging results.
Four models were then created: one including the third PSA measurement only, and the others including both the third PSA measurement and each of the three methodologies for calculating PSAV.
Although the three methodologies provided similar sensory spaces, some differences were identified in terms of discriminative ability, conclusions regarding similarities between samples and perceived difficulty.
The three methodologies also differed in their ability to detect differences among samples due to formulation variables and the stability of sample configurations.
Sensitivities were compared after consensus findings were determined by the presence of the same result in two of the three methodologies used in each case.
Similar(32)
Two of the four methodologies have undergone major changes.
The results show that the convergence between the two methodologies still needs to be improved.
It was found that the mean grain size from the two methodologies agree within experimental error.
Thirdly, the relevant quality checking work of the two methodologies is also conducted to detect the accuracy of the two methodologies.
We finish by presenting some opportunities for successful integration of the two methodologies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com