Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The results of the tests were evaluated using the classification of Landis and Koch in which a value of κ < 0.20 would be poor, 0.21 0.40 weak, 0.41 0.60 moderate, 0.61 0.80 good, and 0.81 1.00 very good agreement.
Similar(59)
The sensitivity of the test was evaluated using serial diluted samples of cultured H. meleagridis and showed positive amplification for concentrations comprised between 10 and 10−1 parasites/ml of culture.
The test was evaluated using three cohorts.
The statistical significance of these tests was evaluated using FDR correction.
Correlation coefficient significance tests were evaluated using the cor and cor.test function in R (v.3.1.0).
Each of the rapid tests was evaluated using sputum specimens collected from re-treatment patients with smear positive tuberculosis.
The accuracy of this test was evaluated using finite-element modeling.
Differences in survival during the IPN challenge test were evaluated using the Mantel-Cox test in GraphPad Prism (version 5.01, GraphPad Software, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA).
Where applicable, statistical differences between the different groups tested were evaluated using Student's t-test and results were expressed as means ± s.e.m.m
The ductility of the walls tested was evaluated using the work damage indicator calculated at each loading step from the hysteretic loops.
The developed testbed is evaluated using several manufacturing scenarios.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com