Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
The tests of interaction were not significant.
The tests of interaction between objective physical function and mortality by cancer type are provided in the online Supplementary Results.
One of the underlying assumptions of the tests of interaction with E as the response, EGT, EGD, and EGG, is that E is normally distributed.
This includes that the tests of interaction between gender and gendered life on mental ill-health could generally not be statistically verified.
Thirdly, the tests of interaction were not specified in advance, and we had no hypothesis as to what the nature of the interaction might be (which subgroups were most likely to respond differentially to the intervention).
While the tests of interaction were not significant, three studies observed increased MTHFR-breast cancer risks with low folate intakes which are in line with our results [ 18, 21, 23].
Similar(54)
The test of interaction between cisplatin and erlotinib was conducted on the interaction term using a one-sided Wald statistic to determine whether β3>0, indicating synergy, defined as a more than additive effect.
The test of interaction was marginally significant (p = 0.05, Table 3).
A P value < 0.05 for the test of interaction was considered statistically significant.
The test of interaction between non-pharmacological and pharmacological trials was not significant (P=0.84).
If the test of interaction is not significant, the tests of the main effects are not confounded.
Related(20)
the tests of relationship
the examination of interaction
the outcome of interaction
the verification of interaction
the measurement of interaction
the testing of interaction
the inspection of interaction
the complexities of interaction
the platforms of interaction
the kinds of interaction
the tests of regression
the tests of literacy
the tests of uplink
the wheels of interaction
the subtleties of interaction
the tests of course
the effects of interaction
the tests of leadership
the results of interaction
the tests of system
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com